WebA 1970 Princeton lecture series, published in book form in 1980 as Naming and Necessity, is considered one of the most important philosophical works of the 20th century. It introduces the concept of names as rigid … WebUnder the influence of Kripke's later work philosophers have come to distinguish several conceptions of necessity and possibility, in a manner to be described below; but …
8 - Saul Kripke: Naming and Necessity - Cambridge Core
Web23 feb. 2024 · The first issue Kripke discusses is the descriptivist theory of names. Many earlier philosophers identify names as having significance because they evoke … Web18 feb. 2024 · It argues that while Saul Kripke defends metaphysical theses about the descriptive semantics of names, the way the reference relation is determined, and the capacities and dispositions of human beings and physical objects, his most important philosophical accomplishment is in the way he posed and clarified the questions, and not … fox varney \\u0026 company
Kripke’s Naming and Necessity: Lecture I - University of Notre Dame
In the later Naming and Necessity, Kripke suggested that the principle could be derived directly, assuming what he called rigid designation. A term is a rigid designator when it designates the same object in every possible worldin which that object exists. Meer weergeven In modal logic, the necessity of identity is the thesis that for every object x and object y, if x and y are the same object, it is necessary that x and y are the same object. The thesis is best known for its association … Meer weergeven • A posteriori necessity • Rigid designator • Naming and Necessity Meer weergeven The derivation in Kripke's 'Identity and Necessity' is in three steps: (1) $${\displaystyle \forall x\Box (x=x)}$$. (2) $${\displaystyle \forall x\forall y(x=y\to (\Box (x=x)\to \Box (x=y)))}$$. (3) $${\displaystyle \forall x\forall y(x=y\to \Box (x=y))}$$ Meer weergeven WebKripke is referring to statements about the identity of mental states with brain states, as in identifying pains with C-fiber stimulations. Kripke argues that these statements are not contingent but instead are necessary. He argues that such identity statements are necessarily true even though this may only be discovered a posteriori . WebSummary Preface Saul Kripke notes that he will clarify only some confusions present in the original presentation of the lectures, rather than make any serious revisions. He clarifies issues pertaining to central issues of Naming and Necessity including possible worlds and rigid designators. He argues against the concept of possible worlds as faraway lands, … fox v cnn ratings